In a group orgy of about 5 men, 1 was eyeing 2.
And in any group orgy of about 5 men, there is always an odd-gay-out - that's 5.
3 & 4 started getting it on.
2 went down on 1.
1 was about to cum when 2 went in for a kiss and 5 went in to s*ck 1's member.
1 had no desire for 5 and in fact have denied him access to him the whole orgy time (up until that time).
Preferences - that was a clear rule in the orgy. No one forces himself to anyone - whether to give or to receive.
But like the same situations before: andiyan na, lalabas na at napaubuya mo na lang kahit hindi mo gusto.
1 & 2 are office mates.
1 is openly gay.
2 is discreet like i-haven't-accepted-myself-yet-as-gay-but-i-am-willing-to-have-sex-with-you
On a drunken birthday night, 1 & 2 found themselves lying next to each other.
1 searched for 2's member, 2 willingly obliged.
They had one intense f*ck-session.
Only 2 came.
"Ang dumi mo p*tang ina mo - ginamit mo pa ako." 2 suddenly said after dressing up. "Kapag inulit mo pa ito, makatikim ka talaga ng hinahanap mo - bakal ka!." 2 continued.
1 enjoyed every bit of the moment and he feels like what 2 just said is to emancipate himself from the "gay" act that just happened.
1 & 2 are partners.
They would have been partners for five years this year.
1 has always been promiscuous - having affairs every now and then.
2 tolerated it - he made himself to think that he was not enough and that it was "normal" to have affairs in gay relationships.
2 was always conscious that he looks good for 1, that he took care of 1, that 1 should always have the upper hand in everything.
And when times came that 1 wanted to live with someone else, 2 would not object and would wait until 1 decides to come back to him.
Question: Which of the three cases would fall under Violence Against Gays (VAG)?